13 May

Canadians Looking For Ways To Pay Mortgages Faster, Scotiabank .

General

Posted by: Steven Brouwer

Canadians would like nothing more than to be rid of their mortgage debt, according to a new poll released by Scotiabank.

 Almost half of Canadians (46%) are saddled with mortgage debt; of those with a mortgage, a staggering 86% indicate that it is important to pay their mortgages expeditiously.

“Many Canadians know ways to reduce the life of their mortgage – such as increasing, matching or making additional payments – but it can often seem difficult to implement, especially if your budget is already stretched,” said David Stafford, Managing Director, Scotiabank Real Estate Secured Lending. “What many Canadians may not realize is that even small changes can shave years off a mortgage. “

The key to reducing what for many is their largest debt, is to have a strategy in place. Stafford reminds mortgage holders to utilize methods like making bi-weekly mortgage payments instead of monthly to shorten amortization and reduce interest over time; increase payments over time, if budget allows for it, and increase payments slightly year-over-year.

Also, Stafford suggests employing a strategy not only for paying down debt- but for taking on debt as well. There is much focus on deciding how you are going to pay down debt- but it only makes sense to plan ahead when taking out debt as well. 

In doing so, the debt holder is able to only take out the debt that they need, and to contribute as efficiently as possible to paying it down quickly.

Most Canadians are already taking advantage of bi-weekly payments- 46 % choose to make payments every other week. However, there are still nearly four-in-10 (38 %) Canadians who are making mortgage payments either monthly or semi-monthly.

Similarly, many Canadians are already taking advantage of options to make additional payments wherever possible: “The study showed that the majority of Canadians (65 %) are able to make additional payments on their mortgage and 75 % of those actually do it. One-third of Canadians (33 %) make additional payments whenever they can afford to, one-in-five (20 %) make additional payments annually and 8% make extra payments monthly.

13 May

Debt on home equity lines of credit: $220-billion

General

Posted by: Steven Brouwer

Canadian homeowners owe $220-billion on their home equity lines of credit, according to a study on the composition of the country’s mortgage market, with most of the money going toward renovations and investments.

The Canadian Association of Accredited Mortgage Professionals found in its spring survey that 5.7 million Canadians now have a mortgage, owing a collective $860-billion. In the last year, about 200,000 people managed to pay off their housing debt completely.

While the association has tracked mortgage debt for years, it is the first time it has broken out data on home equity lines of credit, which are loans taken out against the value of a home. The study found 15 per cent of mortgage holders took out equity in their home in the past year, with the average amount estimated at $30,000. The $26-billion was used for renovations ($9.4-billion), investing ($9.4-billion), debt consolidation ($5-billion) and the rest for “purchases and other purposes.”

The government made it more difficult for Canadians to access the equity in their homes in January, as part of a package of mortgage changes meant to cool down a hot housing market, saying it would no longer provide insurance on personal credit lines secured by homes.

The loans are still available, but the interest costs could move higher as banks take on greater risk.

The report also showed that Canadians are making larger down payments when buying a new home – with the average amount paid up front at 30 per cent, up from 26 per cent two years earlier.

And as policy makers worry whether homeowners will find themselves in trouble as interest rates rise, the study found that 63 per cent have fixed-rate mortgages that won’t change until their term expires. Thirty per cent have variable rates, which are more susceptible to interest rate fluctuations.

Meanwhile, only 22 per cent of all mortgage holders have amortization periods longer than 25 years. The government also clamped down on 35-year amortization periods in January, making 30-years the longest amortization period allowed. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/personal-finance/mortgages/debt-on-home-equity-lines-of-credit-220-billion/article2018424/

13 May

How the home price forecasts changed

General

Posted by: Steven Brouwer

The Canadian Real Estate Association has been adjusting its forecast for 2011 as economic circumstances warrant, and on Monday took another crack at the numbers.

Its first prediction was made in February, 2010, when it said prices would fall 1.5 per cent as sales fell 7.1 per cent.

Monday’s numbers were rosier, as stronger than expected sales across the country and high prices in B.C. caused the trade association to amend its outlook to a 1.3 per cent decline in sales and a 4 per cent gain in prices.

Here’s how it got there:

Initial forecast for 2011, February 2010

Sales: -7.1 per cent

Prices: -1.5 per cent

“Interest rate increases will contribute to weaker national sales activity in 2011.”

June, 2010 forecast for 2011

Sales: -8.5 per cent

Prices: -2.2 per cent

“While sales activity is unfolding as expected in Ontario, the decline in affordability in British Columbia impacted sales in the province during the first quarter. Additionally, changes to mortgage regulations announced in February are expected to marginally impact activity.”

July 2010 forecast for 2011

Sales: -7.3 per cent

Prices: 0.9 per cent

“Weaker than anticipated sales activity during the crucial spring home buying season in Canada’s four most active provincial markets prompted the revision. The decline is consistent with the exhaustion of pent-up demand from deferred purchases during the economic recession, and sales having been pulled forward into early 2010 due to changes in mortgage regulations.”

November, 2010

Sales: -9 per cent

Prices: -0.8 per cent

“Sales activity in the third quarter of 2010 began on a weak footing, but gained traction as the quarter progressed. Improving momentum for home sales activity suggests the resale housing market is stabilizing, but weaker than expected third quarter activity has reduced CREA’s annual forecast.”

February, 2011 forecast for 2011

Sales: -1.6 per cent

Prices: 1.3 per cent                                                                                                                                                                                             “The upward revision to CREA’s forecast for 2011 reflects recent improvements in the consensus economic outlook and a further expected improvement in consumer confidence.”                                                                                                                                                                                                              May 9 forecast for 2011                                                                                                                                                                          Sales: -1.3 per cent                                                                                                                                                                             Prices: 4 per cent

“Although sales activity in the first quarter of 2011 came in largely as expected, multimillion dollar property sales in Greater Vancouver have surged unexpectedly. These sales have upwardly skewed average sale prices for the province and nationally, prompting the average price forecast to be revised higher http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/economy-lab/daily-mix/how-the-home-price-forecasts-changed/article2016467/

13 May

Five steps to scoring a mortgage

General

Posted by: Steven Brouwer

A variety of factors can keep you from qualifying for a mortgage. The big ones include a low credit score, insufficient income for the size of the loan you want, insufficient down payment and excessive debt. All of these factors are within your control, however. Let’s take a look at your options for overcoming any liabilities you may have as a borrower

1. Repair Your Credit and Increase Your Score

To lenders, your credit score represents the likelihood that you will make your mortgage payments in full and on time every month. Therefore, with most loans, the lower your credit score, the higher your interest rate will be to compensate for the increased risk of lending you money. If your credit score is below 620, you will be considered subprime and will have difficulty getting a loan at all, let alone one with favourable terms. On the other hand, if you have a credit score above 800, you’ll easily be able to get the best interest rate available (also known as the par rate). (Find out how your borrowing activities affect your credit rating in The Importance Of Your Credit Rating.)

Measures you can take to improve your credit score relatively quickly include paying down revolving consumer debts, such as credit cards or auto loans, using your debit card instead of your credit cards for future purchases, paying your bills on time every month and correcting any errors on your credit report. However, some flaws, like seriously late payments, collections, charge-offs, bankruptcy and foreclosure, will only be healed with time. (Read How To Dispute Errors On Your Credit Report to find out how to address reporting mistakes.)

In addition to managing your existing credit responsibly, don’t open any new credit accounts. Applying for new credit temporarily lowers your credit score, and having too much available credit is also considered a warning sign. Lenders may be afraid that if you have a lot of available credit, you’ll take advantage of it one day and adversely affect your ability to make your mortgage payments. (For more tips and techniques to help you rebuild your ruined credit rating, read Five Keys To Unlocking A Better Credit Score.)

2. Get a Higher-Paying Job

If lenders say your income isn’t high enough, ask them (or your mortgage broker) how much more you need to earn to qualify for the loan amount you want. Then try to find a new job in your existing line of work where you’ll be able to earn that much money.

Because lenders like to see a steady employment history, you’ll have to stay in the same line of work for this strategy to be successful. This can be disappointing news for borrowers, as switching professions entirely might offer the best chances for a salary increase. However, switching companies can also be a good way to get a significant boost in income. Significant raises from existing employers aren’t that common, but a new employer knows he’ll have to offer something special to get you to make the switch. (Read Negotiating For Employment Perks for tips on reaching an agreement with your boss.)

If switching companies right now won’t be enough to get the raise you need, think about things you can do relatively quickly to make yourself more valuable to employers. Is there a continuing education program that you could complete? If you’re a legal secretary, could you become a paralegal? If you’re a receptionist, could you become a secretary? A career counselor or headhunter might be able to give you some guidance specific to your situation about how to improve your marketability and how to reach your income goals. (Read Six Steps To Successfully Switching Financial Careers to learn how to make adjustments without starting over.)

Unfortunately, getting a part-time job on top of your full-time job may not provide what lenders consider qualifying income. The part-time job may be viewed as temporary, and since it will probably take you at least 15 years to pay off your mortgage, lenders are looking for you to have long-term income stability. (Increase Your Disposable Income gives you ideas on how to make more money now, which can make a big difference down the line.)

3. Save Like Crazy

The larger your down payment, the smaller the loan you’ll need. In addition, the lower your loan-to-value ratio (LTV ratio), the less risky lenders will consider you. Both of these factors will make you more likely to qualify for a loan. Be aware that you may have to reach a certain down payment threshold, like 10 per cent or 20 per cent (with 20 per cent being the most conventional), before a larger down payment will help you qualify for a loan. (Learn more in Mortgages: How Much Can You Afford?)

4. Don’t Pay More Than the Bank’s Appraised Value

The bank will not want to lend more than the house is worth because they could be on the losing end of the deal, should you foreclose and owe more than the bank could get for it. A 20 per cent down payment also becomes much less valuable if the house is worth 20 per cent less than the purchase price. Collateral value is important to lenders, so it should be kept in mind when making an offer to purchase a property. (Read 10 Tips For Getting A Fair Price On A Home and learn how to make sure your house is worth the price you pay.)

5. Reduce Your Debt

To a lender, what constitutes excessive debt is not a set number – it’s a total monthly debt payment that is too high for you to be able to afford the monthly mortgage payment you’re asking for. When deciding how much loan you qualify for, lenders will look at what’s called the front-end ratio, or the percentage of your gross monthly income that will be taken up by your house payment (principal, interest, property tax and homeowners insurance), and the back-end ratio, or the percentage of your gross monthly income that will be taken up by the house payment plus your other monthly obligations, such as student loans, credit cards and car payments.

The more debt you’re required to pay off each month, whether it’s “good debt” like a student loan or “bad debt” like a high-interest credit card, the lower the monthly housing payment lenders will decide you can afford, and the lower the purchase price you’ll be able to afford. Decreasing your debt is one of the fastest and most effective ways to increase the size of loan you’re eligible for. (Learn what to watch for before you find yourself drowning in debt in Five Signs That You’re Living Beyond Your Means.)

Playing to Win

Qualifying for a mortgage isn’t always easy. Lenders require all applicants to meet certain financial tests and guidelines and allow a limited amount of flexibility within those rules. If you want to score a mortgage, you’ll have to learn how to play the game, and you’re likely to win if you take the steps outlined here http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/personal-finance/mortgages/five-steps-to-scoring-a-mortgage/article1925218/page2/

9 May

58,000 Jobs

General

Posted by: Steven Brouwer

Hiring surged at North American companies in April, reminding investors the economic recovery continues to build underneath the wild swings in commodity markets.

Canada added 58,000 jobs in April, bringing the unemployment rate down 0.1 percentage point to 7.6% and returning fulltime employment to the level of October 2008 for the first time, Statistics Canada said Friday.

Perhaps more encouraging were figures from the United States. Employers there added 244,000 workers to their payrolls, the biggest increase in 11 months and trouncing expectations for a rise of 186,000. Private-sector hiring led the charge, as companies created 268,000 new jobs, the most in five years.

“The U.S. labour market continues to strengthen, greatly allaying recent concerns about a slowing economic recovery,” said Sal Guatieri, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets.

It was a relief after a volatile week that had the price of oil plunge 12%, silver collapse 27%, copper fall 6% and gold slide 4.5%.

Markets stabilized on Friday, with the S&P/TSX rising 111 points to 13,567 and the Dow Jones industrial average up 55 at 12,639.

The ongoing improvement in the Canadian labour market means the Bank of Canada is still likely to resume raising interest rates in the second half of the year barring a commodity drop so sharp it destabilizes the global outlook, economists said.

“I would say that on balance the employment numbers would have a bigger effect on the bank’s decisionmaking,” said Douglas Porter, deputy chief economist with BMO Capital Markets. “They can’t be whipsawed by weekto-week news in commodity prices.”

He added while commodity prices are not as high as they were just a short week ago, they are still up in general this year, and oil prices at around US$100 a barrel are still quite encouraging for most Canadian oil companies.

It would take a serious and ongoing dip in the commodity market to influence Canada’s central bank, Mr. Porter said.

“If the deep downdraft is being driven by real concerns about the United States and the global outlook, then I think the bank would deeply reconsider the need for any further rate moves,” he said. “I guess if we drop back below where we were at the start of the year, the bank would probably take that into account, and we were around US$90 [per barrel] at the start of the year,” Mr. Porter said with respect to oil prices.

On the other hand, Derek Holt, an economist with Scotia Capital Markets, said while the jobs numbers are solid, the recent correction in the commodities market may already be enough to influence the bank.

“I think that gets bigger weighting,” he said, adding “I think [the bank’s] on hold for quite some time. Our call remains that they’re on hold until October -so, later than the consensus.”

But Dawn Desjardins, assistant chief economist for RBC Economics, agreed with Mr. Porter that only a drop in commodity prices that destablized the outlook for the global economy would influence the Bank’s reasoning and she does not see the recent “gyrations” as sufficient.

“From the Bank’s perspective, I think they try to look though the noise, as we all do,” she said.

Ms. Desjardins expects to see the interest rate hiked 0.25 of a percentage point in July and said the employment report substantiates the view that the trend is toward growth.

Thursday’s job numbers were also noteworthy for the fact that 41,000 of the new jobs were part-time and the total number of hours worked remained 0.6% below the October 2008 level.

“There’s been a less than handy recovery in hours worked, which is to say there’s greater slack in the economy than that represented by the number of jobs,” said Stewart Hall, economist at HSBC Securities, who nonetheless still expects a rate hike of 25 basis points in July.

Other notable numbers from Friday’s labour force survey:

– The part-time trend was reflected in Ontario, which posted a gain of 55,000 jobs, 46,000 of which were part-time.

– Newfoundland and Labrador was the only other province to show a significant gain, picking up 3,100 jobs.

– Meanwhile, employment dropped in Nova Scotia and Manitoba -down 5,500 and 3,300 jobs, respectively -and the rest of the provinces avoided significant drops or gains.

– Compared with April 2010, Canada’s employment increased by 283,000, a gain of 1.7%.

– The service sector led the way with the creation of 36,000 new jobs while employment in both construction and manufacturing held steady in April.

– The statistics agency also noted that women aged 55 and over picked up 29,000 jobs last month while there was little change in other demographics. http://www.financialpost.com/news/jobs/4743688/story.html

9 May

US dollar on verge of crossing devastating thresholds

General

Posted by: Steven Brouwer

It is almost becoming an affront to the legacy of George Washington to have to grace the lowly greenback.

While the currency managed to claw back some ground amid turmoil on global markets this week, it remains on the verge of sinking below a pair of important thresholds. The first is the 2008 record low.

But perhaps an even greater indictment of the U.S. dollar is its depreciation against the euro, a currency that’s one sovereign default away from an existential crisis. At US$1.50, the euro will have climbed all the way back from last year’s plunge.

The downward trend is quickly lowering confidence in the currency among the major creditors of the United States.

“I think you’ll see a lot of turnover once we cross those thresholds,” said Mark Calabria, director of financial regulation studies at the Cato Institute in Washington, D.C. “And I think we’re going to cross those thresholds.”

Of the forces guiding the greenback, almost all of them promise further weakness.

About the only mitigating factor is the sheer economic power of the United States, which remains the world’s safe haven of choice, effectively putting a limit on the dollar’s losses.

“Absolutely, there is a floor under the dollar, but we’re not there yet,” Mr. Calabria said. And nobody knows quite where that floor sits.

Against a basket of currencies, the dollar has lost almost 18% since last June and more than 10% since December, raising the concern that panic selling has already set into foreign exchange trade. The U.S. dollar index fell to 72.933 on April 29, nearing the all-time low of 71.329 set during the financial crisis in 2008.

“The rout of the U.S. dollar has begun in earnest,” Dennis Gartman, a trader and editor of the Suffolk, Va.-based Gartman Letter, wrote in a recent commentary, noting the dollar’s fall against virtually every major currency in the world.     For the rest of the story, click here http://www.financialpost.com/news/Vanishing/4743690/story.html

9 May

Why I paid $10,000 to break my mortgage

General

Posted by: Steven Brouwer

Last September, my wife and I started scouring the city for a new house. We were living in a cozy bungalow, but with a growing kid and another on the way, we decided it was time to move.

Buying a new house is, of course, expensive, so I wanted to do whatever it took to reduce my costs. Most of the fees couldn’t be avoided, but there was one costly payment I desperately wanted to steer clear from: The mortgage penalty charge.

I had just over 12 months left on my five-year mortgage term, which meant that I either had to break my mortgage or stay with my current lender by transferring my mortgage to my new house. The latter option would have allowed me to avoid the fee. However, my lender couldn’t give me the best interest rate.

The new lender, a bank, was offering a variable rate of 2.25 per cent, a much lower rate than my old lender was willing to offer. I calculated that over the term I’d be better off paying the fee and taking the lower rate.

It was going to cost me $10,000 to break my contract. It felt like an unnecessary cost — I paid my lender so much in interest over the four years, why would I have to cough up so much cash?

I asked my broker to see if the lender would waive the fee, even though I was using a new lender for my next house, but they didn’t. Peter Veselinovich, vice-president of banking and mortgage operations at Investors Group, isn’t surprised. “The charge isn’t negotiable,” he says.

While the penalty may seem like an arbitrary sum, it’s not a cash-grab, he says.

The lender takes mortgage funds from money invested in GICs and other products and then it pays investors interest on those investments.

The idea is to match a five-year mortgage with a five-year GIC, so investors can get paid back at the same time as the mortgage comes due.

If a mortgage is broken, the lender needs to come up with money to fill the gap between the investment coming due and the mortgage ending. Hence the fee. The lender then takes that lump sum and invests it, so it can pay investors back when its GIC comes due.

The penalty is calculated two ways: you either pay 90 days of interest or what’s called an interest-rate differential, which is a penalty based on your old rate and a new rate based on a shorter term.

For example, let’s say you wanted to exit your 5 per cent five-year term with three years left to go. The lender would look at the current three-year term rate, which, say, is 3 per cent, and then charge you interest on the difference, 2 per cent, for 36 months. The sum also depends on how much money you still owe the bank.

However it’s calculated, the payment can be huge.

Darick Battaglia, a mortgage broker and owner of Dominion Lending Centres’ Barrie location, says that while it may seem as though people have to empty their bank account to pay the penalty, ultimately, by paying the lower rate, they’re getting that money back in mortgage savings.

Whether you’re moving houses, or just want to break a mortgage to take advantage of a lower interest rate, people often pay the penalty so they can free up more disposable income.

“It can help people get into a better financial position, because they have more disposable income,” says Battaglia. “They may find that it’s better to invest that money in an RRSP.”

If you’re moving, there are strategies to help reduce the penalty or even not pay it at all.

Almost all mortgages allow people to put a certain percentage of money down on a house every year; I was allowed to pay 20 per cent of my balance every 12 months.

In some cases, lenders will allow you to designate the first 20 per cent — it could be less or more depending on your lender — of the proceeds of a sale of a house towards the prepayment in order to pay down the outstanding balance and so reduce the mortgage penalty.

Investors Group is one institution that allows this, but not all do.

Battaglia has dealt with many lenders who refuse to honor this type of arrangement. They want two checks: one for the prepayment and one to pay off the mortgage.

My own lender refused to let me make one payment; I had to borrow money from my broker, who paid my prepayment three days before closing. I had to pay him back with some of the proceeds of the sale. It was a major hassle. But I did save about $1,500.

Some lenders will eat the fees themselves to retain the business. Again, most want the money. Battaglia says that some banks — he’s seen this happen with Scotiabank and TD — will waive the fee as long as you extend your term. He often uses the penalty as a negotiating tool.

“I’ll tell a lender I’m shopping around and while we’d like to keep a client’s business with your company, what can you do on the penalty?” he says. “A lot of times the penalty gets reduced or it’s paid off by the lender.”

Porting a mortgage to a new house is another way to avoid the fee.

Let’s say you have $100,000 left on a mortgage with a 4 per cent rate, but you need $200,000 more for the new house. The bank will give you the additional money at the new rate, which could be 3 per cent. You’d keep the same term or extend it and now you’d pay a blended rate, in this case 3.5 per cent on $300,000.

“There are no penalty costs, because you’re still honouring the original contract,” says Veselinovich.

Most people will have to open their wallet when they break a mortgage.

Fortunately, you can avoid paying administration fees that the lender will charge you. It’s not necessarily a big cost — Veselinovich says people get charged between $75 and a few hundred dollars — but why pay more money than you have to?

“These fees should be readily negotiable based on your past performance and your relationship with the lender,” he says.

While I did get my penalty reduced by making a prepayment before closing, I still had to write a cheque for about $8,000. It was painful at the time, but now that I’m in my new house, paying a new mortgage at a much lower rate, I don’t think about the penalty anymore.

Now I have to figure out a way to convince Best Buy to give me a deal on TVs http://www.moneyville.ca/article/981221–why-i-paid-10-000-to-break-my-mortgage

9 May

Canadian unemployment rate slips

General

Posted by: Steven Brouwer

Canada’s economy created an impressive 58,300 jobs last month, almost all of them in Ontario, and a big portion of them part-time.

It was enough to bring the unemployment rate down to 7.6 per cent, matching the lowest jobless level since the early months of the recession.

Economists had expected a more modest 20,000 pick-up following a weak March. But they also noted that a higher number was in the offing due to possible one-time hiring for the federal election. Statistics Canada says most of the gains were in the service sector, but it was unclear whether many were related to the election campaigns. Although the jobs increase was dominated by part-timers, there were 17,200 new full-time jobs created in April.

The agency says that was enough to recover all the full-time jobs that were lost in the 2008-2009 recession for the first time.

However, hours worked still remain slightly below pre-recession levels.

Regionally, Ontario saw 54,800 jobs added, while six of 10 provinces actually saw their level of employment drop moderately during the month. http://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/Canadian-unemployment-rate-capress-3308494693.html?x=0

2 May

Rent or buy? Do the math

General

Posted by: Steven Brouwer

A young couple who have been renting in our modest Toronto condo building recently bought a home a couple of miles away in a nice old neighbourhood with the aim of starting a family. The house is a big, detached fixer-upper and the renovation costs will be extensive.

In moving up to the rungs on the property ownership ladder, our young friends are committing themselves to a quantum leap in monthly expenses: They came up with a substantial down payment; they are taking on a mortgage payment, property tax bill and other expenses almost twice as large as their $1,600 rent; and they are spending a large amount on the renovation and other costs associated with buying a house.

It is a story that has unfolded millions of times in Canadian history and one that will continue to unfold because home ownership is deeply ingrained in our culture, a cornerstone of getting established and getting on our way in life. People will make great sacrifices and otherwise twist themselves out of financial and emotional shape to buy into the dream.

They willingly become what we used to call “house-poor,” paying well over the one-third of household income that many professionals believe should be the threshold.

Over the past decade, owning has been a financial success for most people, with prices rising almost in a straight line, with low, low interest rates feeding into the equation and with homeowners’ equity subsequently bounding higher.

And yet, if it has been just about as good as it gets for so long, perhaps conditions are going to deteriorate at least somewhat, with prices likely to stabilize or retreat a little and with interest rates set to rise modestly at least.

Our friends and other buyers this spring will know that Canadian house price gains have been flattening out. The Teranet-National Bank House Price Index for February published this week showed house prices gained just 0.1% from January for a 12-month gain of 3.8%. It was the eighth consecutive month of deteriorating gains.

While the forecast of a 25% drop in house prices over the next few years by one widely quoted economist seems far-fetched under present circumstances, a pattern of smaller gains likely signals a flat to slightly lower market.

So, is it time to revisit buying versus renting? For most of the 30% of Canadians who rent their accommodation it’s simply not an option. Getting their hands on a significant down payment and having the flexibility to meet higher payments if rates rise is difficult at best.

But some people with the wherewithal to buy a property might want to keep renting, keep saving and investing, and keep their options open. Other long-time owners might even want to consider selling and renting, thereby locking in their tax-free gains.

If you wish to see how the math works, visit United Mortgage Group’s Rent vs. Buy Calculator website. Even your technodunce reporter could plug in some numbers and come away with worthwhile conclusions.

A two-bedroom condo in our building might sell for $400,000. Let’s say you have a $100,000 down payment, a mortgage rate of 4.5% over five years, a $672 monthly condo fee, $200 a month in property taxes and other expenses of, say, $100 month.

Let’s also say that a two-bedroom might rent for $1,600 a month in the building, other costs might total $100 a month and the rent might rise 2% a year over five years.

All other things considered, the purchased condo would have to appreciate 2.33% a year, selling at $441,571 to match the gain made by renting a similar property in the building and investing the difference in outgoings at a conservative 2.5% a year.

The other way around, an owner could sell for $400,000 — with net proceeds of about $375,000 — and rent for $1,600 a month. The $375,000 could pay a conservative net return of, say, $10,000 a year. That $1,600 a month plus $100 in expenses would add up to $20,400 a year.

But deduct the net investment return of $10,000 a year and the condo fees of $672 a month, property tax of $200 and other expenses of $100 (for $11,664 a year), and the monthly rent for the former owner is basically paid. Or the former owner could invest the $10,000 a year and still end up paying only about $728 a month more than he was when he was owning.

Of course, this is just the rough math, which doesn’t take into account other factors, such as pride of ownership, the sense of place and the strong probability of building equity.

But geez. If I could live in the building basically for what I’m paying now in fees, taxes and insurance (by deploying my $10,000 a year investing return), and have my $375,000 to “invest” in winters in Waikiki and nice overnighters in Niagara-on-the-Lake, well then ….

It’s a thought, but only that. They’ll probably carry me out of here feet first from our condo, the equity in which may one day be needed to help us out in one of the emergency situations that can arise in older age.

Meantime, it wouldn’t hurt for everyone to do some math and determine what’s best financially for them — renting versus buying. And then, of course, throw the math out the window and succumb to the emotional tug of home and hearth. http://www.financialpost.com/personal-finance/mortgages/Rent+math/4691358/story.html

2 May

Selling house not just about highest price

General

Posted by: Steven Brouwer

The number one question you need to ask yourself if you’re selling your home this spring is: How do I net the most money?

It’s not how do I get the most money for my home. It’s how do I keep the most money in my pocket after paying all my expenses, including commissions and fees.

Discounters are popping up everywhere now that they can access the Multiple Listing Service. Then there’s still the full-service broker who promises a better price and ultimately more money in your pocket.

A settlement last year between the Competition Bureau and the Canadian Real Estate Association, which represents about 100 boards across the country and almost 100,000 agents, allows consumers to have “a mere listing” on the MLS. Being on the MLS system is key since about 90% of transactions are handled by organized real estate.

A poll commissioned by LawPro and TitlePLUS, which sells title insurance, was released Tuesday and it shows confusion still exists in the marketplace.

The poll found even though 72% of Canadians were not aware of the changes made to the MLS, 45% of Canadians would still consider selling privately or using a real estate lawyer to help them sell.

“What these findings show us is that there is an appetite among Canadians to conduct the sale of their home privately,” says Ray Leclair, vice-president of TitlePLUS.

So you can be a do-it-yourself real estate agent and use the MLS. But do you want to?

Market conditions have to factor into your decision. There hasn’t been a U.S.-style collapse here, but it’s no longer a seller’s market, meaning you don’t just stick a sign in the ground and wait for the pigeons to flock. You’re going to have to work.

“For the discount that you’re getting, am I willing to take the gamble that my house is being shown at its optimum,” says Gary Siegle, Calgary-based regional manager for mortgage broker Invis Inc., about private selling.

He says the industry has been sticking to its guns when it comes to commission rates -generally around 5% of the purchase price -so if you’re using an agent, the negotiation might be on the service being provided for that commission.

“The professional service real estate agent is not going to give [commission up] just because someone has access to the MLS. They have to articulate the value more to justify their fee,” Mr. Siegle says.

Phil Soper, chief executive of full-service firm Royal LePage Real Estate Services, says the industry has not moved much off commissions since the agreement with the government.

“I think the impact in the market in the first year postchanges has been in the low end of the market,” says Mr. Soper, who says that narrow segment of the market is less than 15% of the overall sales volume.

He says for sale by owner or FSBO companies are now merging their operations with independent agents so customers also get an MLS listing as part of their service. “I don’t think they are actually selling any more houses. The listings are just showing up on more websites than they used to,” Mr. Soper says.

One of those FSBO companies is PropertyGuys.com. Walter Melanson, managing director of the Moncton-based company, says he currently has about 9,000 active listings across the country.

“I watch the comments [of the major real estate companies] and they say nothing has changed and nothing will ever change and that’s the way they built their mousetrap,” Mr. Melanson says.

What he and others are doing is creating a service that allows you to list with his company for as little as $399. When you sign up, his website hooks you up with a registered real estate agent who doesn’t do much but put your home on the MLS, for an extra $299.

The company’s Ontario representative, a licensed real estate agent, has close to 1,000 listings. She’s based in Hamilton but accepts listings from as far away as Elliot Lake, so she’s not doing too many showings.

“We want someone to compare how much it costs to sell your home using PropertyGuys to, say, Re/Max. You do that math and you’ll see quite the difference,” he says.

It’s no small amount. When you consider the average home is now selling for close to $375,000, at 5%, that’s $18,750 in commission.

However, consider if you do choose do it yourself on the MLS, you are forcing buyers to jump through one more hoop. In the case of Property Guys, the buyer has to click on the MLS broker’s listing office and then punch in the listing number before he’s directed to the seller.

“The bounce rate is amazing,” Mr. Melanson says. “Who wouldn’t look for their dream home and make that extra click? Our data says people will make that click. We’ve had to deliver magic within a narrow set of rules.”

But you have to wonder whether that extra work will affect your sale price at the end of the day. If you save $20,000 in commission, what’s the point if your house sells for 5% less?

Market conditions ultimately play into any decision. It comes down to whether you think your agent can earn that commission by getting you a better price or meeting a goal of selling your home in the time frame you want. http://www.financialpost.com/personal-finance/mortgages/Selling+house+just+about+highest+price/4680266/story.html