9 Jun

Five myths about homeowner’s insurance

General

Posted by: Steven Brouwer

Homeowner’s insurance is one of the most common types of insurance and one of the least understood. Many homeowners believe that their policies will cover them for practically any damage sustained to the house or contents. The reality is that homeowner’s policies contain many exclusions and restrictions on coverage that can leave you with a coverage gap. Here are five common myths about homeowner’s insurance. (For related reading, also take a look at The Beginner’s Guide To Homeowners’ Insurance.)

1. Loss-of-Use Coverage

If you have damage to your home severe enough that you cannot live in it while it is repaired, you likely expect that the insurance company will put you up in a hotel while the work is being done. However, that is not necessarily true. Not all policies include a loss-of-use provision. If you have to pay for a hotel, meals and other services out of pocket, it can add up quickly and put you at financial risk. If loss-of-use is covered, it will be stated explicitly in your policy, along with any limits of coverage. For example, your policy may state a maximum per diem amount or restrict the length of time the expenses will be paid for.

2. Replacement Cost

Replacement cost in a homeowner’s policy refers to valuing the loss at the amount it will cost to replace the item. For example, if your four-year-old computer is lost in a fire, replacement cost coverage would allow you to purchase a new one with similar features. Most homeowners believe that is what will happen if they have a claim, however, the bulk of policies do not carry this clause. If not included, losses will be valued at what they were worth in their condition before the calamity. The four-year-old computer might be valued at $250 – not enough to purchase a new one. Replacement cost clauses are a valuable inclusion in a homeowner’s policy.

3. Flood Coverage

Almost all homeowner’s policies exclude flood coverage, along with earthquakes and other natural disasters. Floods can occur from a number of causes, such as a hurricane, burst pipes or sewer backup. A flood is one of the most common causes of home damage and the destruction of contents. There are companies that specialize in flood coverage, and, if you live in a susceptible area, look into having a separate flood policy. Your mortgage company may require this additional coverage as well. (For more information, see Understanding Lender-Required Flood Insurance.)

4. Termites

Termites live all over North America but are most destructive in southern climates, where their lifecycles are not affected by cold weather. Termites eat wood – lots of it – and can eat the supports in your house as easily as fallen leaves in the forest. They live in large colonies and, collectively, can destroy the structure of your home. Repairing termite damage and eradicating them can cost thousands of dollars. Most policies exclude termites and other pest damage. If you live in a susceptible area, the best insurance is to have the house regularly checked and sprayed by a professional.

5. Valuation of Loss

When you have a house insurance claim, the insurance company will send out an appraiser to determine the extent of the damage and the best way to fix it. The appraiser will assess a value to the loss which will be the minimum the insurance company can pay in order to meet their contractual obligations. However, you do not have to take that value as final. If you can prove your loss should be valued higher, you can negotiate the settlement with the company. Keeping receipts and pictures of valuable items will help you back up your claim.

The Bottom Line

To really know what is in your homeowner’s policy, you should read it thoroughly. Look for exclusions to coverage and decide how you will cover those risks. In some cases, your insurance company will have separate add-ons that they can attach to your policy or you can get specialized insurance from another company. For those risks that cannot be insured, analyze how you will financially cover those risks if they should happen. (For additional reading, also see Insurance Tips For Homeowners.) http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/personal-finance/household-finances/five-myths-about-homeowners-insurance/article2034273/

9 Jun

Little risk of another recession: Flaherty

General

Posted by: Steven Brouwer

The risk that the economic slowdown in the United States will turn into another North American recession is not high, Canada’s finance minister said Tuesday as he cautioned that too many people nevertheless remain jobless in this country.

“I do not think the risk is great,” Jim Flaherty said in response to a reporter’s question at the International Economic Forum of the Americas taking place in Montreal. “There are risk indicators with respect to which we are concerned which we reviewed in the budget [Monday] and which I reviewed with the private sector economists with whom I met last week. The nature of the risks have not changed. We are concerned about debts and deficit in the United States and the need for a convincing longer term plan in the United States” to deal with those problems.

Ottawa is also concerned about some evidence of continuing slowness in the U.S. real estate market which puts a damper on consumer confidence in that country, Mr. Flaherty said. As well, it is worried about the sovereign debt situation among some eurozone countries, including Greece.
“These are all risk factors but they are known risk factors,” Mr. Flaherty said, adding that to address the risk in the latest budget, federal finance officials discounted private sector growth assumptions by $10-billion in nominal GDP each year, equalling a revenue markdown of $1.5-billion annually.

The U.S. economy grew at a 1.8% annual rate in the first quarter but job growth remains anemic, prompting U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke to say Tuesday that the central bank should maintain monetary stimulus to boost a “frustratingly slow” recovery. U.S. employers hired 54,000 more people in April, well below the 165,000 expected by economists.

“Until we see a sustained period of stronger job creation, we cannot consider the recovery to be truly established,” Mr. Bernanke said in a speech in Altanta.

The U.S. economy is growing above “stall speed,” Deutsche Bank AG foreign exchange analyst Alan Ruskin told Bloomberg in an interview Tuesday.

“A lot of people say that if the U.S. economy slows below 2% in year-over-year gross domestic product historically, we’ve slipped in to recession. The key is that we stay above that line, otherwise that is perceived as stall speed and other issues kick in.”

The pace of economic recovery in the United States is crucial for Canada because America is Canada’s largest trading partner, buying 75% of all Canadian exports like oil, wood and cars. Any major slowdown would hurt Canadian businesses and force layoffs here.

Mr. Flaherty maintained that unemployment in Canada also remains too high, even as his government initiates targeted hiring investments. The country’s unemployment rate stood at 7.6% in April as the economy added 58,000 mostly part-time jobs. Employment has grown by 1.7% in the last year.

Asked if the Canadian government has picked a preferred candidate to lead the International Monetary Fund, Mr. Flaherty said not yet. Former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn resigned last month amid allegations he sexually assaulted a New York City hotel worker. Agustín Carstens, the head of the Mexican central bank, and Christine Lagarde, France’s finance minister, are vying for the job.

In a speech to conference delegates, Mr. Flaherty stressed the importance of sound fiscal management for an elected government, noting no one truly foresaw the credit crisis in the fall of 2008 and subsequent recession. He said “it’s unpredictable” when the next shock might come.

The finance minister on Monday delivered a budget that included a pledge to bring the federal government back into surplus position by 2014-2015. He said he will do that through a combination of $4-billion in annual spending cuts and closing tax loopholes to generate another $4.1-billion.

The cuts mark the most intense attempt to rein in public sector spending in more than a decade. The government is conducting an operational review of the federal service and some departments have begun laying off staff.

Opposition against the cuts is expected to grow in the months ahead.

Canadian Auto Workers union president Ken Lewenza said Monday the government’s  spending will wipe out thousands of jobs and hurt service delivery. “With the economic rebound being so uncertain and anemic private sector investment growth, these billion-dollar cuts are the last thing Canada needs,” Mr. Lewenza said.

But compared to what a private company would do to trim spending, the government’s $4-billion plan is not very ambitious, Mr. Flaherty argued.

Mr. Flaherty’s savings target represents 5% of Ottawa’s $80-billion in annual discretionary spending. The government won’t book the savings until it achieves them and has not provided any details of which programs and departments will be affected.

http://business.financialpost.com/2011/06/07/canada-can-offer-lessons-for-recovery-flaherty/